Back Pain Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Back Pain, including details on lower back pain, sciatica, treatment, prevention, medication. | ||||||||
|
Back muscle strength and fatigue in healthy and chronic low back pain subjects: a comparative study of 3 assessment protocols.da Silva RA, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Larivière C, de Oliveira E School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, QC, Canada. OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of 3 different back test protocols in measuring differences in strength and fatigue between subjects with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). DESIGN: Descriptive study using a repeated-measures design. SETTING: A research laboratory within a rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen healthy subjects and 13 subjects with CLBP were assessed in a single session to compare the 3 protocols. The protocols were an upright position test (UPP), a semicrouched lifting test (LIF), and the Sorensen fatigue test. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Moments of force and surface electromyography were recorded bilaterally from 4 homologous back muscles while the subjects performed static trunk extension efforts for each protocol. Fatigue was quantified by the slopes of the linear regression of electromyography time-series. RESULTS: The back muscle fatigue and strength scores did not differ significantly for the 2 subject groups for any of the 3 protocols. The electromyography fatigue indices revealed that the Sorensen fatigue test and UPP produced more fatigue in the back muscles than the LIF. CONCLUSIONS: It was impossible to specify which protocol is more sensitive to low back status because no between-group difference was observed for any of the 3 tests. Published 13 April 2005 in Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86(4): 722-9.
© 2004-2008 Back Pain Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||